Even by the late s, computer-mediated communication CMCsuch as email, Internet Relay Chat IRCUsenet news groups and bulletin boards, was limited in ability and usability, as it relied heavily on text and required a variety of software for each application, together with specialised skills to operate it efficiently Herring
Story telling in virtual spaces The nature of virtual interaction Tools There is no particular order to this by the way. Rosanna Tarsiero has veered between lecturing, the dispensation of wise sayings and the odd attempt to reconcile conflicting parties.
She told me off at one point but then refused to answer the counter. Eileen Clegg explored the issue of stereotyping in some depth with some fascinating personal stories.
David Coleman raised the question of story and asked me a specific question in respect of stories which I attempt to answer below.
In addition to this Andy Roberts upset a few people by expressing amazement at an American attempting to use irony.
John Maloney interjected the odd fulmination in the style of Welsh Baptist preachers of my youth: Now its interesting to note that many of those players are active on other list serves and many of the rules of interaction and expectations between the parties are established.
I have met a few, others I have only come to know thought on line interactions over time.
I have criticised and supported most of the players over time and have been criticised and supported in my turn. Mostly good humored, although on one occasion I was flamed as a troll for what I considered legitimate criticism. Matt by the way is starting to take over my general role of curmudgeon and teller of the emperor that he has no clothes in these list serves which is giving me more space to, on occasion but I promise, not to excess, act in a reasonable, moderate and temperate manner.
Signals and validation Are there more or less signals available to us in a virtual community than when we meet face to face f2f? How do the different signals allow us to build trust?
I suggested in one response that there were more clues face-to-face f2f and Charles cited scientific evidence along the same lines.
Human communication is after all more than just listening to words, its also about observation of physical, chemical and other signals and I thought taking that position would not be controversial. Scott Allen in an insightful response challenged me, arguing that on line your entire history can be traced as you chat.
He expressed this as follows: Online, your entire history — all of our past CMC conversations, all of your writings on a particular topic, references to you by other sources, the deep reflective thinking of a blog, etc.
And not only can I see what you have said about yourself, but I can see what others have said about you.
Now I think this is a fair point. I have found, and previously confessedthat disclosure on a blog can be deeper than f2f,in terms of conversations with strangers.
When you blog you start to be more confessional in revealing what you think, and the origins of those thoughts, than you would be in a casual conversation with a stranger. Less so I think for really deep disclosure, but then that takes more than one meeting to achieve. So I think the case is proven that blogs have allowed people to know other bloggers better than in most f2f exchanges in other than conditions of deep trust.
Matt made the legitimate point that not everyone blogs, so this mechanism is not always available. I think he should blog by the way but that is the evangelism of a recent convert speaking.
It is also true that the speed with which I can check up on someone is far greater in a virtual environment, and I have more resources available to me. If they blog then a skim of their postings gives me a understanding of where they are coming from, and what sort of things concern them.
So overall I agree with Scott to a large degree but with some qualifications. The virtual has capabilities that are not present in the physical, but the reverse is also true. However there is a clear danger of confusing the process of validation of information sources with the stimulation and interpretation of biological signals; both are useful but our brains have had more co-evolutionary development time with the latter than the former.
In a social setting I can observe and learn from the dynamics of their interaction with other participants. This includes testing their ability to respond quickly to a challenge or question.
In certain contexts that can be important.Virtual Communities and Social Capital 17 proposed virtual community, with the number of residents interested home shopping drastically lower than the other services.
Virtual communities are also an ideal area to study consumption because, unlike other types of virtual groups (chat rooms, blogs, social networks, etc.), virtual communities are often dedicated to consumption (Kozinets, ). The strong connection between technologies and globalization has made the phenomenon of interculturality increase at a global level.
The aim was to determine the perception of teachers and students in the use of a . A community is a small or large social unit (a group of living things) that has something in common, such as norms, religion, values, or schwenkreis.comities often share a sense of place that is situated in a given geographical area (e.g.
a country, village, town, or neighborhood) or in virtual space through communication platforms. Durable relations that extend beyond immediate genealogical. Differences between factor analysis and principal component analysis are: • In factor analysis there is a structured model and some assumptions.
In this respect it is a statistical technique which does not apply to principal component analysis which is a purely mathematical transformation. Virtual communities allow us to create sophisticated masks very easily and to change them and enable the consequent identities to persist.
Here I do think that f2f has advantages, yes there are still con artists out there and anyone over 40 will remember Robert Redford in The Sting.